Quantification Process, Sociometric, Numerical Scale 9 and Social Interpretation Research in Social Humanity under Artifical Intelligent Era
Keywords:
Quantification Process, Sociometric, Numerical Scale 9, Social Interpretation, Artificial Intelligent EraAbstract
This research delves into the intricate measurement of the Harmony Index in Bekasi City within the context of the Artificial Intelligent era, employing a quantification process, sociometric analysis, and a numerical scale of 9. The study explores the social dimensions that impact harmony and utilizes AI to extract insights from non-structural data, offering a comprehensive understanding of the community's goodness, beneficial and well-being. The variables Xi are assessed in terms of Perception, Participation, and Acceptability (PPA) perspectives, and their weighted scores contribute to the Harmony Index formula. Statistical analyses, including correlation, variance, and standard deviation, enable the evaluation of the data, leading to profound social interpretations. The study identifies regularities, response rates, and significance scores while categorizing respondents. This research enhances our understanding of harmony, informs policy recommendations, and paves the way for community betterment.
One significant outcome of the study is the categorization of respondents based on their levels of engagement, classifying them as engaged, moderate, or non-engaged. This categorization provides a nuanced understanding of how different segments of the community interact with the variables under investigation. Furthermore, the research successfully distilled essential insights from a vast pool of non-structural narrative data, narrowing down the analysis to the most relevant and informative content, ultimately enhancing the depth and quality of the findings.
References
Babbie, E. R. (2016). The Practice of Social Research. Cengage Learning.
Choudhury, M. A. (2013). Complexity and endogeneity
in economic modeling. Kubernetes, Vol.42 no.2
pp.226-240, Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Choudhury, M. A. (2013). Handbook of tawhidi
methodology: economic, finance, society and
science. Trisakti University Press, Jakarta.
Choudhury, M.A. (2019). “Wellbeing Objective Criterion
(Maslaha)”; Chapter 4 of author’s The Tawhidi
Methodological Worldview, A Transdisciplinary
Study of Islamic Economics. SpringerNature.
Colleen M. Harkey., (2016). Measuring the Customer
Experience: A Guide to Designing and Using
Experience Scales
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative,
Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.
Sage Publications.
Gujarati, D. N., Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic Econometrics,
th edition, Singapore: McGraw Hill International
Edition
Moeheriono, (2012). Indikator Kinerja Utama (IKU).
Rajagrafindo Persada, jl. Leuwinanggung No.121
Kel. Leuwinanggung. Kec.Tapos, Kota Depok
, Indonesia.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation
Methods. Sage Publications.
Richard A. Easterlin’s seminal work, “Does Economic
Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical
Evidence” (1974), examines the impact of economic
growth on human well-being, offering empirical
evidence on the subject.
Suriadi, J.,Halim,P.,Muktiono,A.,Kususanto,A.,Saksono,H., Hargen,B.,(2021). Riset Publik Model Wellbeing
Methodoloy., Penerbit Widina, Bandung, 2021
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2015). Foundations of Mixed
Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and
Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral
Sciences. Sage Publications.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Jadi Suriadi Suriadi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.